A tool for democracy, a reading reflection of Communities in Cyberspace

November 4, 2007


I was so impressed by the story about the city of Wilmington, North Carolina.The residents of the area were supposed to work with the housing authority to develop a plan for the downtown redevelopment.  However, they were not satisfied with the information the housing authority provided, so they asked for relief on the Internet. Many experts such as architects and lawyers in cyberspace provided them with the knowledge of how to deal with the authority and led them to successful negotiations. This story suggests the ideal state and uses of cyberspace.
As the authors mentioned in the article, cyberspace offers a kind of parallel society to the real world. In that, people in different races, social status, and occupations anonymously interplay and create cyber communities. Everyone who has access to the internet can ask help with solutions from any region of the world. In the last six years since this article was written, we have witnessed many cases where people in cyber space have united, and by sharing critical information, have successfully
stopped the excessive behavior of some large corporations.such as the Nike, sweat shop incident. Many examples are found in Gilmore’s article, “The Gates Come Down”, that we read last week.
Kollock and Smith wrote, “The Internet is used as a tool for change in a disadvantaged community, demonstrating a way to route around unhelpful government agencies to find people with information and expertise that they are willing to share.” The Wilmington case, or Senator Strom Thurmond case
that was introduced in the article shows that the cyberspace we live in as well as our real life, is heading in a more democratic, healthy direction.  It is about time for us to spread the access to the cyber community to the third world where people suffer from poverty, disease, and inhumane acts. We should establish a direct hot line to the world for those who can not rely on their governments, by expanding cyberspace access to those countries.
Questions

1, What are the downsides and upsides for anonymity of cyber community?

 2, Would an attempt to control on cyber community to expel fake information not discourage people from stating their opinions or sharing their information?

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized. .

3 Comments Add your own

  • [...] Keiichi (NQ) [...]

  • [...] questions of note (many personal anedotes) this week :  Adam,  Amy, Annie, ChrisE, Corey, Jody, Keiichi, Maury, SarahF, SarahL, [...]

  • 3. Tharaa Bayazid  |  November 25, 2007 at 1:08 am

    I believe you made a very clear point when you said that cyberspace offers a kind of parallel society to the real world. And yes, the cyberspace we live in as well as our real life is heading toward a more democratic and healthy direction.

    But I have a small correction to make here, you said: “It is about time for us to spread the access to the cyber community to the third world where people suffer from poverty, disease, and inhumane acts”, third word countries are defined differently than you just stated; they are either developing countries or under-developed countries but is not that they are suffering from poverty and diseases, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are considered third world countries. From Wikipedia: Third World in referring to countries currently called either “developing” or “under-developed”, especially in Latin America, Africa, Oceania, and Asia, that were unaligned with either the Communist Soviet bloc or the Capitalist American bloc during the Cold War (1945–1989). Third World is synonymous with all countries in the developing world, regardless of their political status. For the most part, Third World did not include China. Politically, the Third World emerged at the Bandung Conference (1955), which established the Nonaligned Movement. Numerically, the Third World dominates the United Nations, but is so culturally and economically diverse that its political cohesion is hypothetical. The petroleum-rich countries (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Libya, etc.) and the new industrial countries (Taiwan, Republic of Korea, Singapore, etc.) have little in common with poor countries (Haiti, Chad, Afghanistan, etc.).

    Cheers,

    Tharaa :)

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Pages

Categories

Archives

Meta

Blogroll